Earn While Learning Web3 Programming>> Start Here FREE!!!
EXERCISE:
i. What Are The Differences Between Hyperverse And Open Source Libraries Monetization methods?
ii. Summarize in your own word in this forum below:
(NOTE: please, don't just copy past from other student - instead answer in your own word base on your level of understanding the lesson and resources)
NOTE:
This Is An Exercise From Our FREE COURSE:
Hyperverse 101 - [DECENTOLOGY HYPERVERSE PROGRAMMING COURSE 001]
(If you have not enrolled yet, you can join the course totally for FREE).
Some of the differences between Hyperverse Vs Opensource Library Monetization methods/model are:
- Usually once opensource library release their codes and include commission, dApp developer can edit that out or override it before they deploy their smart contract which means no earning for the developer and that is one of the major reasons why there is shortage of opensource smart contract libraries out there because it is not self sustainable
An example is hashlips NFT Presale source code anyone can copy it and then remove the part from it that gives 5% to Hashlips for his hard work and dedication to write the code, update and make it fully opensource to get some pay for the hardwork.
Challenges like this slows down the development of such open source code
- Hyperverse solves this by been pre-bundled smart modules to solve specific problems and the core smart contract (smart modules) codes are not editable.
So, if not ready to pay, then you can't use it
- Hyperverse protect opensource developers and encourages them to program more composable smart contracts since they can now have it monetized even as an opensource with rest of mind and reliable income flow as their users grows.
Open Source Library Auditing: monitization can be removed
hyperverse: monitization cant be removed